← Commercial & Pricing

Mphasis / 2019–2020

Tail Spend Consolidation

A global procurement engagement across 26 countries, focused on consolidating tail spend, negotiating with suppliers and moving the engagement toward break-even.

ProcurementNegotiation
Illustrative procurement model

Tail Spend Consolidation

Tail Spend ConsolidationA procurement operating model. Exact savings, supplier reductions and financial metrics are not depicted. The numbered controls below describe every stage.Tail spendDispersed small vendorsGlobal suppliersAcross 26 countriesProcurement engagementConsolidation & negotiationSupplier strategyConsolidation objectiveEngagement economicsApproaching break-even
  • Tail spendDispersed small vendors
  • Global suppliersAcross 26 countries
  • Procurement engagementConsolidation & negotiation
  • Supplier strategyConsolidation objective
  • Engagement economicsApproaching break-even
Documented flow / conversion Conceptual relationship
Understand the tail

The procurement engagement involved a fragmented base of small vendors across 26 countries.

Read the complete architecture & boundaries

A procurement operating model. Exact savings, supplier reductions and financial metrics are not depicted.

  1. Understand the tail. The procurement engagement involved a fragmented base of small vendors across 26 countries.
  2. Negotiate and consolidate. Vivek led the engagement and negotiated across regions to improve its economics.
  3. Track the commercial direction. By recollection, the engagement approached break-even after roughly 18 months; profitability is not claimed.

THE PROBLEM

What needed to change.

The engagement began at a negative margin, with a dispersed base of small suppliers across countries.

MY CONTRIBUTION

Where I came in.

I returned to Mphasis to lead the procurement engagement and negotiated with vendors across regions including Australia, China, Europe, the United States and Mexico.

The team’s delivery

The engagement worked toward vendor consolidation and better economics; exact savings and vendor reductions are not established here.

THE APPROACH

How it came together.

  1. Review the fragmented supplier base.
  2. Negotiate with vendors across countries.
  3. Work toward better engagement economics through consolidation and cost negotiation.

THE OUTCOME

What the work made possible.

By my recollection, the engagement was approaching break-even after roughly 18 months. It is not described as profitable.

Technical & implementation detail

This account focuses on commercial practice and personal contribution; a software implementation is not specified.

This account concerns supplier consolidation and negotiation economics. Spend under management, engagement margin and negotiated savings are different measures; precise amounts and the margin basis are withheld pending review.

LET’S CONNECT THE DOTS

What’s the complex problem
on your desk?

Explore how engineering depth and commercial judgment can work together.

Start a conversation

These are personal accounts of professional work. Company and client names identify context and do not imply endorsement. Conceptual diagrams explain relationships; they are not production screenshots.